alicu blog

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, January 17, 2013

THE LONG CON.

Posted on 7:59 PM by dimple
Tonight, at the top of his usual umpteen from-my-cold-dead-hands posts, this is what I saw at The Ole Perfesser's site tonight:


It links to Bloomberg's Mayor's Against Illegal Guns and their Demand a Plan page ("Join more than 800 mayors and over a million grassroots supporters to demand that Congress step forward with a plan to end gun violence").

I thought maybe the ad was instantly-generated content, and that if I accessed the site from Shooty McRedneck's IP address I'd get something else -- Wise emergency rations, maybe. But on the right side, I saw another such ad with PJ Media co-branding:


It's even more fun viewing these ads on Instapundit's "Mayors Against Illegal Guns" search page, right above items like "Crimes of gun-grabbing mayors: Second Amendment group exposes Bloomberg’s hypocrisy. An awful lot of these mayors do turn out to be crooks, don’t they?"

I love capitalism. Seriously, get me a good enough price and I'll run those mangled-fetus pro-life ads. I know how to deal with their kind.

There's a lesson in this, but it takes a long time to read.

UPDATE. The PJ Media banner's always there, irrespective of ad content, so I guess the Bloomberg ads are contextual, possibly based on keywords. It's win-win for the Perfesser, as commenter Helmut Monotreme says, because it "just props up their hypothesis that liberals are coming to take their guns."

I still want those mangled fetus ads. Roe v. Wade, Roe v. Wade, Roe v. Wade. C'mon, Randall Terry, your money's as good as anyone else's.

UPDATE 2. In comments Robot Slave was giving me a hard time about my lack of internet advertising awareness, so I went and looked at a paper:
In recent years, Internet advertising has become increasingly tailored to individual users. In the simplest case, contextual advertising, advertising networks choose which ads to display on a webpage based on the contents of that page. In the more complex technique of online behavioral advertising (OBA), advertising networks profile a user based on his or her online activities, such as the websites he or she visits over time. Using this profile, advertising networks show ads that are more likely to be of interest to a particular user, charging a premium price to do so.
Ah, so Instapundit's ad network sized me up and thought I'd go for some anti-gun ads, huh? You lose, Madison Avenue!

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • SCAMDAL.
    Conservatives are all rushing forward with their dollies, showing where Big Gummint gave them bad touch. Among my favorites is Stanley Kurtz...
  • (no title)
    NEW VOICE COLUMN UP , about the news that the U.S. birth rate is way down and how rightbloggers have reacted to it. Short version: This is...
  • EXTREMISM IN DEFENSE OF FREEBIES IS NO VICE.
    When I wrote last weekend about the Bundy Ranch situation -- in which Sagebrush Rebels threatened U.S. federal officers with violence -- I ...
  • ATTENTION CONSERVATIVES WHO WERE OUTRAGED OVER BRENDAN EICH:
    If you thought it was liberal fascism for the Mozilla board to oust its CEO for an anti-gay contribution , now's your chance to show us ...
  • ADVICE TO CONSERVATIVES (OFFERED NOT IN KINDNESS, BUT BECAUSE THEY'RE TOO STUPID TO TAKE IT).
    Don't use "orphanage" in a headline. It reminds people of why they hate you. (See also "widows.")   Geraghty goes on...
  • NEW VILLAGE VOICE COLUMN UP...
    ...about all the impeachment bullshit and I have to say, I think I found something new to say about it -- but you tell me. UPDATE. In comm...
  • THE HUSTLER.
    OK, so you're a former Bush Administration factotum and now National Review 's foremost torture enthusiast . You like to keep abreas...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2014 (179)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (28)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (25)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (28)
  • ▼  2013 (286)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (24)
    • ►  October (23)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (24)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (28)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ▼  January (28)
      • ANNALS OF THE CULTURE WARS ETC. ETC.
      • STILL MORE ANNALS OF THE CULTURE WARS.
      • BIG NIGHT AT THE LYCEUM.
      • NEW VOICE COLUMN UP....
      • THE CONSERVATIVE COMEBACK PART 43,022.
      • TEARS OF THE CROCODILE.
      • CONSERVATISM CANNOT FAIL; IT CAN ONLY BE FAILED.
      • THAT'S RACIST. NO, SERIOUSLY, THAT IS RACIST.
      • IT WAS A GOOD DAY.
      • NEW VOICE POST UP...
      • G.E. THE GREAT EMANCIPATOR.
      • THE CONSERVATIVE COMEBACK, PART 34,282.
      • THE LONG CON.
      • PRESIDENTIAL TROLLING.
      • DRUNK AS A...
      • NEW VOICE COLUMN UP
      • TRY THIS SIMPLE TEST.
      • SQUARE PEG.
      • IT'S OUR OWN STORY EXACTLY! HE BOLD AS A HAWK, SHE...
      • ANNALS OF THE CULTURE WARS: A VERY SPECIAL JONAH G...
      • A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
      • IT'S GOOD FOR YOU.
      • NEW VOICE COLUMN UP...
      • HOW'RE YOU GONNA KEEP 'EM DOWN ON THE FARM AFTER T...
      • I LOST IT AT THE MOVIES.
      • OOGA TO THE OOGITY-BOOGA.
      • HOW THE NUTTY HAVE FALLEN.
      • ANNALS OF THE CULTURE WARS, CONT.
  • ►  2012 (35)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (10)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

dimple
View my complete profile