I do wonder what the left, particularly the British left, thinks of the show. For starters, one of the chief villains is gay.We can stop right there; you could make a parlor game out of guessing Goldberg's other insights ("the whole point of the show is to sympathize with the landed gentry," "the one fairly radical lefty in the show... remains something of a bore," etc). The thing that defies imagination is: What does he think is going on? Is he trying to using conservative hanky code to find if Abbey's producers would like to provide the entertainment on the next NR Sadcruise? Or is he laying the groundwork for the case that, when the history of early 21st Century conservatism is written, Julian Fellowes will be the Goldwater of the Kulturkampf? (After all, as Goldberg's colleague Jay Nordlinger noticed years ago, Fellowes once complimented America. Maybe he's a mole in the commie arts community, and can be recruited to make movies with Bill Whittle.)
Oh, one more thing, from the aesthetic part of Goldberg's episode review:
Indeed, the whole show felt bizarrely cut up, like they had to put it together at the last minute.At last he's talking about something he understands. [Farrrt.]
0 comments:
Post a Comment