alicu blog

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Posted on 7:46 PM by dimple
A PLEASANT SURPRISE. Here's a further development on the "Alinsky! I'll show you Alinsky" theme, taken up by conservatives who realize they have an image problem and will accept any crazy explanation for it except their own actions. It's from J.R. Dunn at American Thinker. He thinks conservatives don't know how to do "the dark arts of image manipulation" (Bob Haldeman chuckles in Hell) and don't fight back when mocked by liberals. Also, traitors like Peggy Noonan and David Brooks sell them out, etc. That's all SOP, but this bit is, so far as I have noticed, an innovation:
...the third major class of response, that of embracing the stereotype, of taking it on as a kind of costume, and even pushing it farther than the left themselves. I knew a noted spokesman for one of the major conservative media organizations who used to appear at public lectures with two heavy-set young men standing at either side of the lectern wearing camo fatigues and sunglasses, thus turning himself from conservative spokesman into Benito Mussolini. This same kind of behavior can be found at all levels of the movement from comment threads all the way to the top. Rush indulges in it all too often. Ann Coulter has made a career of it. While definitely a crowd-pleaser, it is, in the end, self-defeating. These stereotypes were constructed by the left for a reason -- to manipulate the public at large, ignorant of political subtleties and unfamiliar with doctrine, into certain visceral reactions to conservatives and their ideas. They were created to destroy conservatives. Why play along with them?
Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh are playing into liberals' hands by feeding conservatives red meat on a daily basis and making millions of dollars off it. I like to imagine Coulter and Limbaugh reading this, becoming guilt-wracked, and returning to the sober, Cambridge Union Society mode of discourse they used to do, back when it was all about the music.

Mainly I want to know who the Mussolini guy was. I'm guessing Michael Fumento.

Oh, give Dunn credit for offering the brethren practical Alinksy-fu lessons:
Calling Sandra Fluke a "slut" merely generated sympathy for her. Turning her into a clown uncertain what to do with a condom if one was handed to her would have shut the whole campaign down in short order. (How about the Facebook "Sandra Fluke Condom Support Group"?)
The next four years are going to be awesome.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • SCAMDAL.
    Conservatives are all rushing forward with their dollies, showing where Big Gummint gave them bad touch. Among my favorites is Stanley Kurtz...
  • (no title)
    NEW VOICE COLUMN UP , about the news that the U.S. birth rate is way down and how rightbloggers have reacted to it. Short version: This is...
  • EXTREMISM IN DEFENSE OF FREEBIES IS NO VICE.
    When I wrote last weekend about the Bundy Ranch situation -- in which Sagebrush Rebels threatened U.S. federal officers with violence -- I ...
  • ATTENTION CONSERVATIVES WHO WERE OUTRAGED OVER BRENDAN EICH:
    If you thought it was liberal fascism for the Mozilla board to oust its CEO for an anti-gay contribution , now's your chance to show us ...
  • ADVICE TO CONSERVATIVES (OFFERED NOT IN KINDNESS, BUT BECAUSE THEY'RE TOO STUPID TO TAKE IT).
    Don't use "orphanage" in a headline. It reminds people of why they hate you. (See also "widows.")   Geraghty goes on...
  • NEW VILLAGE VOICE COLUMN UP...
    ...about all the impeachment bullshit and I have to say, I think I found something new to say about it -- but you tell me. UPDATE. In comm...
  • THE HUSTLER.
    OK, so you're a former Bush Administration factotum and now National Review 's foremost torture enthusiast . You like to keep abreas...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2014 (179)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (28)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (25)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (28)
  • ►  2013 (286)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (24)
    • ►  October (23)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (24)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (28)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (28)
  • ▼  2012 (35)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ▼  November (10)
      • HERE COMES A REGULAR. Having been interested in co...
      • A PLEASANT SURPRISE. Here's a further development ...
      • ANOTHER DAY IN BIZARRO WORLD. At the Wall Street J...
      • DA, DA. WE LAUGH! At American Thinker, Thomas Lifs...
      • BRINGING A KNIFE TO A CULTURE WAR. Conservatives o...
      • NEW VOICE COLUMN UP, about the miserable rightblog...
      • KISS OF DEATH. David Brooks tells us about the "yo...
      • THE DEAD-ENDERS. Last weekend, as dutifully report...
      • NEW VOICE COLUMN UP, about the new Chick-fil-A, Pa...
      • CONSERVATIVE OUTREACH CONTINUES. The "Ladyparts! H...
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

dimple
View my complete profile